A customer comes into a financial institution and deposits a large amount of cash. He has never done that before. When asked about the deposit, he indicates he recently sold a used car and received…

Question

Options

• AThe bank has received a plausible explanation, so it should do nothing
• BWhile the explanation appears plausible, the institution should, for a period of time, monitor the
• CWhile the explanation may be plausible, the institute should nonetheless file a Suspicious
• DThe institution should close the account before another issues arise

• A
  3% (2)
• B
  71% (41)
• C
  17% (10)
• D
  9% (5)

Explanation

A large cash deposit is a potential indicator of money laundering, especially if it is inconsistent with the customer's profile or behavior. Therefore, the bank should ask the customer about the source and purpose of the funds, and verify the information if possible. In this case, the customer claims to have sold a used car and received cash, which may be a reasonable explanation. However, the bank should not rely solely on the customer's statement, but should also monitor the account for any further cash transactions or suspicious activity that may indicate money laundering. For example, the bank should check if the customer withdraws the cash soon after the deposit, transfers the funds to other accounts or jurisdictions, or engages in structuring or smurfing to avoid reporting thresholds. The bank should not do nothing, as this may expose the bank to regulatory or reputational risks, or facilitate money laundering. The bank should also not file a Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) unless there are other grounds to suspect money laundering, as this may be premature or unnecessary. The bank should not close the account before another issues arise, as this may be disproportionate or discriminatory, and may also alert the customer to the bank's suspicion.

No community discussion yet for this question.