You want to set up charge calculation for freight orders. Valid charges should consist of a base charge based on the distance and gross weight of the freight order, and a supplemental charge per…

Question

Options

• A0
• B2
• C1
• D3

• A
  10% (4)
• B
  64% (25)
• C
  5% (2)
• D
  21% (8)

Explanation

Option B is correct because the scenario requires exactly two distinct charge types: (1) a base charge calculated from distance and gross weight, and (2) a supplemental charge per container. Each charge type requires its own standard instruction charge line, regardless of how many container types exist - the three container types (small, medium, large) are handled within the single supplemental charge line via a rate or condition table, not as separate lines.

Why the distractors fail:

• A (0) is wrong because you cannot configure any charge calculation without at least one charge line - zero lines means no charges are set up at all.
• C (1) is wrong because you cannot merge a distance/weight-based charge and a per-container charge into a single line; they have fundamentally different calculation bases and must be separate.
• D (3) is wrong because the three container types do not each require their own charge line - container type differentiation is done through scale/rate tables within one charge line, not by multiplying lines.

Memory tip: Count the calculation logics, not the data values. "Distance + weight" is one logic, "per container type" is one logic = 2 lines. The small/medium/large distinction is just data inside the second line.

No community discussion yet for this question.