C_LCNC_2406 · Question #55
In SAP Build Apps, what are some classic data entities available? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.
The correct answer is A. OData Integration D. SOAP Integration. In SAP Build Apps, Classic data entities are the legacy integration types built directly into the platform's data layer. OData (A) is correct because it is a standardized SAP-native protocol widely used to connect to SAP backends (like S/4HANA via SAP Gateway), and has been a…
Question
In SAP Build Apps, what are some classic data entities available? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.
Options
- AOData Integration
- BRFC Integration
- CREST API Direct Integration
- DSOAP Integration
How the community answered
(26 responses)- A88% (23)
- B4% (1)
- C8% (2)
Explanation
In SAP Build Apps, Classic data entities are the legacy integration types built directly into the platform's data layer. OData (A) is correct because it is a standardized SAP-native protocol widely used to connect to SAP backends (like S/4HANA via SAP Gateway), and has been a foundational data entity type since AppGyver days. SOAP (D) is correct because it is a classic XML-based web service protocol supported as a built-in classic data entity for integrating with older enterprise services.
RFC Integration (B) is wrong because RFC (Remote Function Call) is an SAP-proprietary protocol that is not directly accessible as a classic data entity in Build Apps - it must be exposed via an OData or REST wrapper first. REST API Direct Integration (C) is wrong because REST integrations in Build Apps are handled under a different category (typically via the "REST API" resource type), not classified as a "classic" data entity.
Memory tip: Think "Classic = Old-school web service standards." OData and SOAP are both mature, standardized protocols with long histories in enterprise integration - that's what makes them the classic pair. RFC is SAP-only and not directly supported, and REST is modern, not classic.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.