You create a new subscription contract with the following bundle product: "Bundle Material has the material type SUBS and 2 subscription components." Which contract structure will result from this…

Question

Options

• AContracts without subitems
• BBundle combination is not allowed
• CContract with 2 subitems
• DContracts with 1 subitem

• A
  11% (4)
• B
  3% (1)
• C
  84% (32)
• D
  3% (1)

Explanation

When a bundle product with material type SUBS is used in a subscription contract, the bundle's individual subscription components are each represented as a subitem in the resulting contract. Since this bundle contains exactly 2 subscription components, the system generates a contract with 2 subitems - one per component - making C correct.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A is wrong because bundles with SUBS components always produce subitems; a flat contract with no subitems would result from a simple, non-bundled product.
• B is wrong because SUBS-type bundles are explicitly supported - the combination is valid and well-defined behavior.
• D is wrong because subitems map 1-to-1 with subscription components; 2 components cannot collapse into 1 subitem.

Memory tip: Think of it as a direct mapping - each subscription component in the bundle "unpacks" into its own subitem on the contract. Bundle of 2 = contract with 2 subitems. If you remember "one component, one subitem," you can always derive the answer from the component count given in the question.

No community discussion yet for this question.