For a company that needs to ensure high availability across their hybrid multicloud environment, which strategy is essential?

Question

Options

• ADeploying all critical applications in a single cloud to simplify management
• BUsing a mix of cloud-native and cloud-agnostic solutions for resilience
• CIgnoring geographic distribution to focus on cost savings
• DLimiting the use of containers and orchestration tools

• A
  6% (2)
• B
  80% (28)
• C
  11% (4)
• D
  3% (1)

Explanation

Using a mix of cloud-native and cloud-agnostic solutions (B) directly addresses resilience in hybrid multicloud environments - cloud-native tools maximize each platform's capabilities while cloud-agnostic tools prevent vendor lock-in, enabling workloads to failover across providers when one becomes unavailable.

Why the distractors fail:

• A is the opposite of resilience - concentrating everything in one cloud creates a single point of failure, defeating the purpose of multicloud.
• C ignores that geographic distribution is a core pillar of high availability; it ensures users are served even when a region goes down.
• D is counterproductive - containers and orchestration tools (like Kubernetes) are precisely what enable portable, resilient deployments across hybrid environments.

Memory tip: Think "B = Best of Both Worlds" - cloud-native for performance, cloud-agnostic for portability. High availability requires spreading risk, not concentrating it.

No community discussion yet for this question.