C1000-163 · Question #76
Which additional license is required to use the Am I Affected scan in the IBM Security QRadar Threat Intelligence app?
The correct answer is D. IBM Watson license. Option D is correct because the "Am I Affected" scan within the IBM Security QRadar Threat Intelligence app integrates with IBM Watson for Cyber Security to perform cognitive threat analysis - determining whether your environment has been exposed to a given threat. Without the…
Question
Which additional license is required to use the Am I Affected scan in the IBM Security QRadar Threat Intelligence app?
Options
- AIBM Security QRadar Console license
- BIBM Security QRadar QVM license
- CIBM Advanced Threat Protection Feed license
- DIBM Watson license
How the community answered
(54 responses)- A13% (7)
- B9% (5)
- C6% (3)
- D72% (39)
Explanation
Option D is correct because the "Am I Affected" scan within the IBM Security QRadar Threat Intelligence app integrates with IBM Watson for Cyber Security to perform cognitive threat analysis - determining whether your environment has been exposed to a given threat. Without the IBM Watson license, this AI-driven analysis capability is not available.
Why the distractors are wrong:
- A (QRadar Console license): This is the foundational license required to run QRadar itself, not a special add-on for the Threat Intelligence app's scan feature.
- B (QRadar QVM license): QVM (Vulnerability Manager) is a separate QRadar module focused on traditional vulnerability scanning, and has no bearing on the "Am I Affected" functionality.
- C (IBM Advanced Threat Protection Feed license): While this sounds plausible given the threat context, it is not the specific license gating the "Am I Affected" scan.
Memory tip: Associate "Am I Affected?" with Watson by thinking "I need Watson (AI) to tell me if I'm affected" - any QRadar feature that performs cognitive or AI-driven threat impact assessment is powered by Watson, making the Watson license the telltale requirement.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.