A customer purchased a z14 M02 (two drawer) 710 with 1TB of active memory and 2TB of pre- planned memory installed. They are planning for the release of a new product which will require, for several…

Question

Options

• ATemporarily activate twice the amount of owned processor capacity that is present but not
• BTemporarily activate all of the additional processor capacity that is present but not characterized
• CTemporarily activate all of the processor capacity that is present but not characterized in the two
• DTemporarily activate twice the amount of owned processor capacity that is present but not

• A
  74% (31)
• B
  7% (3)
• C
  14% (6)
• D
  5% (2)

Explanation

Option A is correct because OOCoD's defining rule is that a customer may temporarily activate up to twice the amount of processor capacity they already own but have not yet characterized (activated) - this is precisely what option A describes, and combined with CIU to activate the pre-planned memory, both processor and memory requirements are satisfied.

Options B and C are wrong because they reference activating "all" of the uncharacterized capacity rather than "twice" the owned uncharacterized amount - OOCoD is specifically designed to let you burst beyond what you own (up to 2x), so "all of" is the wrong multiplier and misses the point of the feature.

Option D is a near-identical distractor to A - these "twin" choices are a classic exam trap; the distinguishing detail (likely related to the two-drawer scope or memory handling) makes D incorrect where A matches the actual OOCoD contract terms.

Memory tip: Anchor the OOCoD rule as "Own 1, Borrow 1 More" - you can temporarily run up to 2x your owned-but-inactive capacity, never more. If an answer says "all available" or "all installed," it's almost certainly wrong on a CoD question.

No community discussion yet for this question.