BCP-620 · Question #88
Nextair Corporation has determined the hardware running BlackBerry Enterprise Server software version 4.1.6 will be insufficient to handle version 5.0. They plan to perform a cutover upgrade using…
The correct answer is B. They will save the cost of an additional SRP Identifier. Option B is correct because a cutover upgrade reuses the same hardware and existing server identity, meaning the organization retains its current SRP (Server Routing Protocol) Identifier. Obtaining a new SRP Identifier carries an additional cost, which is avoided entirely when…
Question
Nextair Corporation has determined the hardware running BlackBerry Enterprise Server software version 4.1.6 will be insufficient to handle version 5.0. They plan to perform a cutover upgrade using the existing SQL database. What is an advantage of implementing this strategy? (Choose one)
Options
- AThere is no downtime for other BlackBerry Enterprise Server software version 4.1.6 instances sharing
- BThey will save the cost of an additional SRP Identifier
- CThere is no need to back up the database prior to upgrade
- DThe SQL database must be hosted locally to the BlackBerry Enterprise Server
How the community answered
(40 responses)- A13% (5)
- B80% (32)
- C3% (1)
- D5% (2)
Explanation
Option B is correct because a cutover upgrade reuses the same hardware and existing server identity, meaning the organization retains its current SRP (Server Routing Protocol) Identifier. Obtaining a new SRP Identifier carries an additional cost, which is avoided entirely when upgrading in place rather than migrating to new hardware.
Why the distractors are wrong:
- A is incorrect because a cutover upgrade actually causes downtime - you're taking the existing server offline to upgrade it. A parallel/migration approach is what minimizes disruption to other instances.
- C is incorrect and dangerous advice; you should always back up the database before a major upgrade, regardless of strategy. No legitimate upgrade method eliminates this best practice.
- D is incorrect because SQL can be hosted remotely in both cutover and migration scenarios - this is not a requirement specific to the cutover approach.
Memory tip: Think "cutover = carry over" - you carry over the same hardware, same SRP Identifier, same cost. The moment you spin up new hardware (migration), you need a new SRP ID and pay for it.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.