AZ-801 · Question #114
QUESTION 116: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some questions mig
The correct answer is B. No. Even if failback is allowed and Server1 is a preferred owner, the role might not fail back immediately due to other failback policy settings not detailed.
Question
Options
- AYes
- BNo
How the community answered
(45 responses)- A18% (8)
- B82% (37)
Why each option
Even if failback is allowed and Server1 is a preferred owner, the role might not fail back immediately due to other failback policy settings not detailed.
Simply allowing failback and listing a preferred owner does not guarantee immediate failback; the specific failback timing policy also dictates when a failback can happen, which is not fully specified.
The "Failback: Allow failback" setting enables the failback mechanism, but the specific failback policy might dictate *when* failback occurs, such as only during a specified time window, preventing an immediate failback. The provided text is incomplete regarding the full failback settings.
Concept tested: Failover cluster failback policy and timing
Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/failover-clustering/manage-cluster-roles#configure-failover-and-failback-settings
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.