You plan to deploy an SAP production landscape in Azure. You need to recommend an Azure support agreement for the deployment. The solution must meet the following requirements: - Receive support for…

Question

Options

• ABasic
• BProfessional Direct
• CDeveloper
• DStandard

• A
  4% (2)
• B
  94% (45)
• D
  2% (1)

Explanation

Professional Direct is the correct choice because SAP's support agreement for production landscapes on Azure explicitly requires a minimum of Professional Direct support - Standard alone does not satisfy this compliance requirement. While Professional Direct provides a 2-hour response for moderate business impact (Severity B), which exceeds the 4-hour requirement, it is the lowest-cost plan that simultaneously meets both the SLA and SAP compliance obligations.

Why the distractors fail:

• A. Basic offers no technical support SLA at all - only billing and subscription assistance.
• C. Developer is limited to business-hours support and is explicitly designed for non-production environments, disqualifying it for SAP production.
• D. Standard does provide a 4-hour moderate-impact SLA, but it does not satisfy SAP's support agreement requirements for production deployments, eliminating it despite the cost advantage.

Memory tip: Think "SAP Production = Pro Direct minimum." SAP needs escalation paths to Microsoft with a Technical Account Manager, which only starts at Professional Direct. If the question mentions SAP production + SAP support compliance, Professional Direct is almost always the answer regardless of which SLA tier is mentioned.

No community discussion yet for this question.