Which of the following would be an argument against the use of nonlethal weapons by the security officer?

Question

Options

• AThey do not pose a substantial risk of death if used properly.
• BThey provide an alternative to guns where the situation requires less than lethal force.
• CUse of nonlethal weapons reduces the risk of death to innocent bystanders.
• DIt might escalate confrontations with security officers because offenders would feel less
• ENone of the above.

• A
  2% (1)
• B
  13% (8)
• C
  3% (2)
• D
  77% (48)
• E
  5% (3)

No community discussion yet for this question.