ANS-C01 · Question #294
A company has two teams: Team A and Team B. Team A has VPCs that run in Account A. The team uses a transit gateway (TGW-A) to route traffic between workloads that run in the different VPCs…
The correct answer is A. Create a resource share for TGW-A Share TGW-A with Account B. Create VPC attachments for. This solution minimizes operational overhead by using a single transit gateway (TGW-A) for both teams, while also leveraging resource sharing between accounts. This approach eliminates the need to create new transit gateways, thus reducing complexity and the operational…
Question
A company has two teams: Team A and Team B. Team A has VPCs that run in Account A. The team uses a transit gateway (TGW-A) to route traffic between workloads that run in the different VPCs. Similarly, Team B has VPCs that run in Account B. Team B uses a different transit gateway (TGW-B) to route traffic between workloads that run in the different VPCs. The company's network team manages the routing for Team A and Team B. The network team wants to retire TGW-B and use a single transit gateway to manage routing for the VPCs of both teams. Which solution will meet this requirement with the LEAST operational overhead?
Options
- ACreate a resource share for TGW-A Share TGW-A with Account B. Create VPC attachments for
- BCreate a resource share for TGW-A. Share TGW-A with Account B. Replicate the TGW-B
- CCreate a new transit gateway (TGW-C) in Account A. Create a resource share for TGW-C. Share
- DCreate a new transit gateway (TGW-C) in a new account (Account C). Create a resource share for
How the community answered
(33 responses)- A79% (26)
- B6% (2)
- C12% (4)
- D3% (1)
Explanation
This solution minimizes operational overhead by using a single transit gateway (TGW-A) for both teams, while also leveraging resource sharing between accounts. This approach eliminates the need to create new transit gateways, thus reducing complexity and the operational overhead of managing multiple transit gateways.
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.