ANS-C01 · Question #226
A company has an application that runs on premises. The application needs to communicate with an application that runs in a VPC on AWS. The communication between the applications must be encrypted…
The correct answer is A. Configure a private VIF on the Direct Connect connection. Associate the private VIF with the. Least operational overhead. No need for a transit gateway since just 1 vpc. Use Site-to-site to make sure encryption. No public VIF.
Question
A company has an application that runs on premises. The application needs to communicate with an application that runs in a VPC on AWS. The communication between the applications must be encrypted and must use private IP addresses. The communication cannot travel across the public internet. The company has established a 1 Gbps AWS Direct Connect connection between the on- premises location and AWS. Which solution will meet the connectivity requirements with the LEAST operational overhead?
Options
- AConfigure a private VIF on the Direct Connect connection. Associate the private VIF with the
- BCreate a transit gateway. Configure a transit VIF on the Direct Connect connection. Associate the
- CConfigure a public VIF on the Direct Connect connection. Associate the public VIF with a Direct
- DCreate a transit gateway. Configure a transit VIF on the Direct Connect connection. Associate the
How the community answered
(14 responses)- A86% (12)
- B7% (1)
- C7% (1)
Explanation
Least operational overhead. No need for a transit gateway since just 1 vpc. Use Site-to-site to make sure encryption. No public VIF.
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.