ANS-C01 · Question #206
A company has agreed to collaborate with a partner for a research project. The company has multiple VPCs in the us-east-1 Region that use CIDR blocks within 10.10.0.0/16. The VPCs are connected by a…
The correct answer is C. Configure a cross-account transit gateway peering attachment between TGW-C and TGW-P. To establish network connectivity between the company's and partner's VPCs, which are connected by separate Transit Gateways in the same region, the most efficient solution with minimum changes is to configure a cross-account Transit Gateway peering attachment between the two…
Question
A company has agreed to collaborate with a partner for a research project. The company has multiple VPCs in the us-east-1 Region that use CIDR blocks within 10.10.0.0/16. The VPCs are connected by a transit gateway that is named TGW-C in us-east-1. TGW-C has an Autonomous System Number (ASN) configuration value of 64520. The partner has multiple VPCs in us-east-1 that use CIDR blocks within 172.16.0.0/16. The VPCs are connected by a transit gateway that is named TGW-P in us-east-1. TGW-P has an ASN configuration value of 64530. A network engineer needs to establish network connectivity between the company's VPCs and the partner's VPCs in us-east-1. Which solution will meet these requirements with MINIMUM changes to both networks?
Options
- ACreate a new VPC in a new account. Deploy a router from AWS Marketplace. Share TGW-C and
- BCreate an IPsec VPN connection between TGW-C and TGW-P. Configure the routing between
- CConfigure a cross-account transit gateway peering attachment between TGW-C and TGW-P.
- DShare TGW-C with the partner account by using AWS Resource Access Manager (AWS RAM).
How the community answered
(61 responses)- A7% (4)
- B13% (8)
- C77% (47)
- D3% (2)
Why each option
To establish network connectivity between the company's and partner's VPCs, which are connected by separate Transit Gateways in the same region, the most efficient solution with minimum changes is to configure a cross-account Transit Gateway peering attachment between the two Transit Gateways.
Creating a new VPC with a third-party router and then sharing existing TGWs introduces significant complexity, additional costs, and is far from a 'minimum changes' solution.
While IPsec VPN connections can connect networks, creating an IPsec VPN between two Transit Gateways in the same region is less efficient and more complex than using Transit Gateway peering, which is specifically designed for TGW-to-TGW connectivity.
Configuring a cross-account Transit Gateway peering attachment between TGW-C and TGW-P is the native AWS solution for connecting two Transit Gateways in the same or different AWS Regions. This approach directly links the two TGWs, allowing their attached VPCs to communicate with minimal configuration changes (creating the attachment and updating TGW route tables) and is designed for high efficiency and scalability.
Sharing TGW-C with the partner account via AWS Resource Access Manager (AWS RAM) would allow the partner's VPCs to attach directly to TGW-C, bypassing their existing TGW-P. This would force the partner to restructure their network, contradicting the 'minimum changes' requirement for *both* networks.
Concept tested: AWS Transit Gateway peering
Source: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/tgw/tgw-peering.html
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.