IAPP
AIGP · Question #40
AIGP Question #40: Real Exam Question with Answer & Explanation
Sign in or unlock AIGP to reveal the answer and full explanation for question #40. The question stem and answer options stay visible for context.
Question
CASE STUDY Please use the following to answer the next question: A local police department in the United States procured an AI system to monitor and analyze social media feeds, online marketplaces and other sources of public information to detect evidence of illegal activities (e.g., sale of drugs or stolen goods). The AI system works by surveying the public sites in order to identify individuals that are likely to have committed a crime. It cross-references the individuals against data maintained by law enforcement and then assigns a percentage score of the likelihood of criminal activity based on certain factors like previous criminal history, location, time, race and gender. The police department retained a third-party consultant to assist in the procurement process, specifically to evaluate two finalists. Each of the vendors provided information about their system's accuracy rates, the diversity of their training data and how their system works. The consultant determined that the first vendor's system has a higher accuracy rate and based on this information, recommended this vendor to the police department. The police department chose the first vendor and implemented its AI system. As part of the implementation, the department and consultant created a usage policy for the system, which includes training police officers on how the system works and how to incorporate it into their investigation process. The police department has now been using the AI system for a year. An internal review has found that every time the system scored a likelihood of criminal activity at or above 90%, the police investigation subsequently confirmed that the individual had, in fact, committed a crime. Based on these results, the police department wants to forego investigations for cases where the AI system gives a score of at least 90% and proceed directly with an arrest. What is the best reason the police department should continue to perform investigations even if the AI system scores an individual's likelihood of criminal activity at or above 90%?
Options
- ABecause the department did not perform an impact assessment for this intended use.
- BBecause AI systems that affect fundamental civil rights should not be fully automated.
- CBecause investigations may identify additional individuals involved in the crime.
- DBecause investigations may uncover information relevant to sentencing.
Unlock AIGP to see the answer
You've previewed enough free AIGP questions. Unlock AIGP for full answers, explanations, the timed quiz mode, progress tracking, and the master PDF. Question stem and options stay visible so you can still see what's on the exam.