IAPP
AIGP · Question #126
Within an established AI governance infrastructure, what might be the most effective governance action to handle third-party AI systems deemed to be high-risk?
The correct answer is A. Align organizational impact assessment activities with relevant regulatory or legal requirements. Aligning impact assessment activities with regulatory and legal requirements ensures that high- risk third-party AI systems are evaluated rigorously and managed in compliance with relevant
AI Governance Program
Question
Within an established AI governance infrastructure, what might be the most effective governance action to handle third-party AI systems deemed to be high-risk?
Options
- AAlign organizational impact assessment activities with relevant regulatory or legal requirements.
- BRe-evaluate the purchase of the third-party AI system deemed to be high-risk, and consider other
- CEstablish policies for handling third-party system failures that include consideration of redundancy
- DDelegate the power, resources and authorization among executive leadership to perform risk
How the community answered
(55 responses)- A67% (37)
- B18% (10)
- C5% (3)
- D9% (5)
Explanation
Aligning impact assessment activities with regulatory and legal requirements ensures that high- risk third-party AI systems are evaluated rigorously and managed in compliance with relevant
Topics
#third-party AI#high-risk AI#regulatory alignment#impact assessment
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.