AIF-C01 · Question #173
A company trained an ML model on Amazon SageMaker to predict customer credit risk. The model shows 90% recall on training data and 40% recall on unseen testing data. Which conclusion can the company…
The correct answer is A. The model is overfitting on the training data. The ML model shows 90% recall on training data but only 40% recall on unseen testing data, indicating a significant performance drop. This discrepancy suggests the model has learned the training data too well, including noise and specific patterns that do not generalize to new…
Question
A company trained an ML model on Amazon SageMaker to predict customer credit risk. The model shows 90% recall on training data and 40% recall on unseen testing data. Which conclusion can the company draw from these results?
Options
- AThe model is overfitting on the training data.
- BThe model is underfitting on the training data.
- CThe model has insufficient training data.
- DThe model has insufficient testing data.
How the community answered
(40 responses)- A43% (17)
- B8% (3)
- C18% (7)
- D33% (13)
Explanation
The ML model shows 90% recall on training data but only 40% recall on unseen testing data, indicating a significant performance drop. This discrepancy suggests the model has learned the training data too well, including noise and specific patterns that do not generalize to new data, which is a classic sign of overfitting. Overfitting occurs when a model performs well on training data but poorly on unseen test data, as it has learned patterns specific to the training set, including noise, that do not generalize. A large gap between training and testing performance metrics, such as recall, is a common indicator of
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.