nerdexam
Amazon

AIF-C01 · Question #173

A company trained an ML model on Amazon SageMaker to predict customer credit risk. The model shows 90% recall on training data and 40% recall on unseen testing data. Which conclusion can the company…

The correct answer is A. The model is overfitting on the training data. The ML model shows 90% recall on training data but only 40% recall on unseen testing data, indicating a significant performance drop. This discrepancy suggests the model has learned the training data too well, including noise and specific patterns that do not generalize to new…

Submitted by obi.ng· Mar 30, 2026Fundamentals of AI and ML

Question

A company trained an ML model on Amazon SageMaker to predict customer credit risk. The model shows 90% recall on training data and 40% recall on unseen testing data. Which conclusion can the company draw from these results?

Options

  • AThe model is overfitting on the training data.
  • BThe model is underfitting on the training data.
  • CThe model has insufficient training data.
  • DThe model has insufficient testing data.

How the community answered

(40 responses)
  • A
    43% (17)
  • B
    8% (3)
  • C
    18% (7)
  • D
    33% (13)

Explanation

The ML model shows 90% recall on training data but only 40% recall on unseen testing data, indicating a significant performance drop. This discrepancy suggests the model has learned the training data too well, including noise and specific patterns that do not generalize to new data, which is a classic sign of overfitting. Overfitting occurs when a model performs well on training data but poorly on unseen test data, as it has learned patterns specific to the training set, including noise, that do not generalize. A large gap between training and testing performance metrics, such as recall, is a common indicator of

Topics

#overfitting#recall#training vs testing#model evaluation

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full AIF-C01 Practice