AD0-E202 · Question #10
Segment used as checkpoint in a Fallout Visualization with four checkpoints must always use which container already?
The correct answer is C. A container that is at a lower level than the overall context of the fallout Visualization. Segments used as checkpoints in Fallout must use a container that is at a lower level than the overall context of the Fallout visualization. With a visitor-context Fallout, segments used as checkpoints must be visit or hit-based segments. With a visit-context Fallout, segments…
Question
Segment used as checkpoint in a Fallout Visualization with four checkpoints must always use which container already?
Options
- AA container that is a high level then the overall context of the Fallout Visualization.
- BA container that is at a visit level for the overall context of the fallout Visualization
- CA container that is at a lower level than the overall context of the fallout Visualization
- DA container that is at a Visitor level for the overall context of the fallout Visualization
How the community answered
(15 responses)- A7% (1)
- B13% (2)
- C73% (11)
- D7% (1)
Explanation
Segments used as checkpoints in Fallout must use a container that is at a lower level than the overall context of the Fallout visualization. With a visitor-context Fallout, segments used as checkpoints must be visit or hit-based segments. With a visit-context Fallout, segments used as checkpoint must be hit-based segments. If you use an invalid combination, the fallout will be 100%. We have added a warning to the Fallout visualization that will display when you add an incompatible segment as a touchpoint. Certain invalid segment container combinations will lead to invalid Fallout diagrams, such as: Using a visitor-based segment as a touchpoint inside a visitor-context Fallout visualization Using a visitor-based segment as a touchpoint inside a visit-context Fallout visualization Using a visit- based segment as a touchpoint inside a visit-context Fallout visualization
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.