What role do reviews of existing components and validation with the latest version play in ensuring a successful migration to AEM Cloud Service?

Question

Options

• AThey limit the scope of the migration to components only, excluding other aspects.
• BThey introduce complexities and delays, making the migration process more challenging.
• CThey ensure that migrated components are compatible and functional in the new environment.
• DThey have no impact on the migration process because components are automatically validated.

• A
  6% (2)
• B
  3% (1)
• C
  78% (25)
• D
  13% (4)

Explanation

Reviewing existing components and validating them against the latest AEM version is a core best practice in migration planning - it ensures compatibility, catches deprecated APIs or features, and confirms components behave correctly in the Cloud Service environment, making C correct.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A is wrong because reviews are not limited to components alone; a thorough migration covers content, configurations, custom code, and integrations.
• B is wrong because reviews reduce risk and surprises - they streamline the process rather than complicate it.
• D is wrong because AEM Cloud Service does not auto-validate custom components; manual review and testing are required, especially for custom or third-party code.

Memory tip: Think of it as a "flight checklist" - you review and validate before takeoff (migration) to ensure everything is compatible and nothing breaks once you're airborne in the new Cloud environment.

No community discussion yet for this question.