AAISM · Question #53
When evaluating a new AI tool for intrusion prevention, which of the following is the MOST important consideration to ensure the tool fits within the existing program architecture?
The correct answer is A. Confirm tool capabilities align with the control objectives. The most fundamental question when adopting any security tool is whether its capabilities actually satisfy the control objectives - i.e., what the security program needs the tool to do. If the tool's functions don't map to your defined control requirements, no amount of SIEM…
Question
When evaluating a new AI tool for intrusion prevention, which of the following is the MOST important consideration to ensure the tool fits within the existing program architecture?
Options
- AConfirm tool capabilities align with the control objectives.
- BSelect a tool that integrates with the existing SIEM.
- CPrioritize a tool that offers real-time anomaly detection.
- DEnsure automated response orchestration.
How the community answered
(36 responses)- A58% (21)
- B22% (8)
- C6% (2)
- D14% (5)
Explanation
The most fundamental question when adopting any security tool is whether its capabilities actually satisfy the control objectives - i.e., what the security program needs the tool to do. If the tool's functions don't map to your defined control requirements, no amount of SIEM integration (B), real-time detection features (C), or automated response (D) will make it the right fit. Options B, C, and D are all desirable features, but they are secondary considerations. Capability-to-objective alignment is an architectural and programmatic prerequisite that determines whether the tool belongs in the program at all.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.