From Avaya Aura release 10.1, which statement regarding Communication Manager (CM) Identity Certificates is true?

Question

Options

• ACM should have a System Manager-signed or Third Party-signed certificate installed.
• BCM can only use a System Manager-signed Identity certificate.
• CCM identity certificates are valid for only 1 year.
• DCM can only use a Third-Party signed Identity certificate.

• A
  75% (21)
• B
  4% (1)
• C
  14% (4)
• D
  7% (2)

Explanation

Starting from Avaya Aura 10.1, Communication Manager supports both System Manager-signed and Third-Party (CA-signed) Identity Certificates, giving administrators flexibility in PKI trust management - making A correct. Option B is wrong because it falsely restricts CM to only System Manager-signed certificates, ignoring the added Third-Party CA support introduced in 10.1. Option D is the mirror error - it falsely excludes System Manager-signed certificates as a valid option. Option C introduces a fabricated 1-year validity constraint; certificate validity periods are configurable and not hardcoded to one year.

Memory tip: Think "Avaya gives you Alternatives" - from 10.1 onward, CM accepts certificates from either System Manager or a Third Party, so the answer with both options is always correct.

No community discussion yet for this question.