In one case study in which Yarra Tram installed 91000 data points on its tram, Cisco improved day to-day tram operations and passenger experiences. Which two things achieved these…

Question

Options

• AMinimizing labor costs.
• BUpgrading real-time device management.
• CIncreasing asset tracking.
• DImproving cyber security.
• EEstablishing better worker-to-worker communication.

• A
  3% (1)
• B
  91% (30)
• D
  3% (1)
• E
  3% (1)

Explanation

Upgrading real-time device management (B) and increasing asset tracking (C) are correct because Cisco's IoT solution used the 91,000 data points to give operators live visibility into tram conditions and locations - enabling faster responses to issues and better scheduling, which directly improved both operations and passenger experience. Minimizing labor costs (A) was not a stated outcome of the case study; the focus was operational efficiency, not headcount reduction. Improving cyber security (D) and establishing better worker-to-worker communication (E) are plausible IoT benefits generally, but neither was identified as a key improvement in this specific Yarra Trams deployment.

Memory tip: Think "Real-time + Real location" - the two R's. Cisco's value here came from seeing devices in real time (management) and finding assets in real time (tracking). Everything else is a red herring from adjacent IoT use cases.

No community discussion yet for this question.