Which two types of traffic are appropriate to use with wireless media? (Choose two.)

Question

Options

• Aaccess control
• Bmotion control
• Csafety control
• Dvirtual control
• Epeer-to-peer messaging

• A
  5% (1)
• C
  95% (19)

Explanation

Safety control (C) and peer-to-peer messaging (E) are appropriate for wireless media because both tolerate the inherent limitations of wireless - occasional latency, variable bandwidth, and shared medium - without catastrophic consequences. Safety control systems (like wireless emergency alerts or sensor-based monitoring) are designed with redundancy and error tolerance built in, and peer-to-peer messaging (chat, file sharing between devices) similarly handles retransmission gracefully.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A (access control): Wired connections are strongly preferred for authentication/authorization traffic because wireless is more vulnerable to interception and spoofing - security infrastructure demands reliability and confidentiality that wired provides.
• B (motion control): Industrial/robotic motion control requires deterministic, ultra-low-latency communication; wireless jitter or packet loss could cause physical damage or injury.
• D (virtual control): This is a distractor term with no standard networking definition - it's designed to sound plausible but doesn't represent a real traffic category.

Memory tip: Think "Slow and Personal" - Safety systems and Peer messaging both work wirelessly because they can handle imperfection. Anything requiring precision timing (motion) or high security (access) stays wired.

No community discussion yet for this question.