Which three midmarket business situations bring the best opportunities for Cisco Business Edition 6000 implementation? (Choose three.)

Question

Options

• Abusinesses with an existing IP-based PBX deployment
• Bbusinesses with an aged TDM phone system implementation
• Cbusinesses that recently merged with or were acquired by a large enterprise
• Dbusinesses with an existing phone system maintenance contract expiring
• Ebusinesses that are moving their headquarters office
• Fbusinesses that are changing their primary type of business

• A
  87% (61)
• D
  3% (2)
• E
  9% (6)
• F
  1% (1)

Explanation

Businesses with an existing IP-based PBX (A) are already running IP infrastructure, making them natural upgrade candidates for the richer unified communications feature set that BE6000 offers - the migration path is shorter and the business case is clear. Companies stuck on aged TDM systems (B) face end-of-life hardware, shrinking vendor support, and a widening feature gap, making them highly motivated to modernize - BE6000 is a targeted fit for their size. Recently merged midmarket businesses (C) inherit incompatible phone systems across both organizations and need a unified communications platform to standardize on quickly.

The distractors fall short for these reasons: an expiring maintenance contract (D) is more likely to result in a simple renewal than a full platform swap; relocating headquarters (E) is a logistical event that doesn't inherently justify replacing a functioning phone system; and changing the primary business type (F) is too vague and indirect to signal a specific communications technology need.

Memory tip: Think "IP, Old, Merged" - an IP-ready business wanting more, an old TDM business needing out, and a merged business needing unity. These are the three pain points BE6000 directly solves.

No community discussion yet for this question.