nerdexam
Microsoft

70-465 · Question #24

Your company has offices in Seattle and Montreal. The network contains two servers named Server1 and Server2 that have SQL Server 2012 installed. The servers are located in separate building within yo

The correct answer is D. Synchronous automatic failover. Given the less than 10 ms latency between servers, synchronous commit mode is feasible, enabling automatic failover for zero data loss and high availability in the AlwaysOn availability group.

Submitted by suresh_in· Mar 5, 2026Design and implement database solutions for SQL Server

Question

Your company has offices in Seattle and Montreal. The network contains two servers named Server1 and Server2 that have SQL Server 2012 installed. The servers are located in separate building within your campus. The latency of the WAN link between the buildings is less than 10 ms. You plan to implement an AlwaysOn availability group on both servers. You need to recommend a failover type for the availability group. What should you recommend?

Options

  • AAsynchronous automatic failover
  • BSynchronous manual failover
  • CAsynchronous manual failover
  • DSynchronous automatic failover

How the community answered

(42 responses)
  • A
    7% (3)
  • B
    5% (2)
  • C
    17% (7)
  • D
    71% (30)

Why each option

Given the less than 10 ms latency between servers, synchronous commit mode is feasible, enabling automatic failover for zero data loss and high availability in the AlwaysOn availability group.

AAsynchronous automatic failover

Asynchronous automatic failover is incorrect because automatic failover requires replicas to be in synchronous-commit mode, and asynchronous commit allows for potential data loss, which is undesirable if network conditions support synchronous commit.

BSynchronous manual failover

Synchronous manual failover is not optimal because, while synchronous commit is appropriate, manual failover introduces unnecessary downtime and administrative overhead when automatic failover is achievable and provides higher availability.

CAsynchronous manual failover

Asynchronous manual failover is the least desirable option as asynchronous commit allows for data loss, and manual failover further increases downtime, neither of which is necessary given the low network latency.

DSynchronous automatic failoverCorrect

Synchronous automatic failover is recommended because the crucial network latency of less than 10 ms allows for synchronous commit mode, which prevents data loss during failover. Automatic failover, which requires synchronous commit, ensures the highest availability by transitioning to a secondary replica without manual intervention.

Concept tested: SQL Server AlwaysOn Availability Group failover types

Source: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/database-engine/availability-groups/windows/failover-and-failover-modes-always-on-availability-groups

Topics

#AlwaysOn Availability Groups#automatic failover#synchronous commit#high availability

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 70-465 Practice