You have a table named AccountsReceivable. The table has no indexes. There are 75,000 rows in the table. You have a partition function named FG_AccountData. The AccountsReceivable table is defined in the following Transact-SQL statement:

CREATE TABLE AccountsReceivable ( column_a INT NOT NULL, column_b VARCHAR(20) NULL) ON [PRIMARY]; You need to move the AccountsReceivable table from the PRIMARY file group to FG_AccountData. Which Transact-SQL statement should you use?

Question

You have a table named AccountsReceivable. The table has no indexes. There are 75,000 rows in the table. You have a partition function named FG_AccountData. The AccountsReceivable table is defined in the following Transact-SQL statement:

CREATE TABLE AccountsReceivable ( column_a INT NOT NULL, column_b VARCHAR(20) NULL) ON [PRIMARY]; You need to move the AccountsReceivable table from the PRIMARY file group to FG_AccountData. Which Transact-SQL statement should you use?

Accepted Answer

C. CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX idx_AccountsReceivable

Answer

A. CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX idx_AccountsReceivable

Answer

B. CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX idx_AccountsReceivable

Answer

D. CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX idx_AccountsReceivable

You have a table named AccountsReceivable. The table has no indexes. There are 75,000 rows in the table. You have a partition function named FG_AccountData. The AccountsReceivable table is defined…

Question

Options

How the community answered

Community Discussion