Which feature of the Cisco network portfolio makes its devices ideally suited for use in a factory?

Question

Options

• Alow-cost options
• Bmultiple licensing methods
• Cruggedized physical characteristics
• Dneed for specialized users

• B
  10% (2)
• C
  86% (18)
• D
  5% (1)

Explanation

Cisco's ruggedized physical characteristics make its devices ideal for factory environments, which expose networking equipment to extreme temperatures, vibration, dust, moisture, and electrical interference that would damage standard office-grade hardware.

• A (low-cost options) is wrong because factory suitability is about durability and reliability, not price - cheap hardware that fails in harsh conditions is no solution.
• B (multiple licensing methods) is wrong because licensing flexibility is a business/administrative feature that applies equally to any environment, not something specific to industrial settings.
• D (need for specialized users) is wrong because requiring specialized users is a drawback, not an advantage - and it doesn't address the physical demands of a factory floor.

Memory tip: Think "factory = harsh environment." Whenever you see industrial/factory context, look for the answer that describes physical toughness (ruggedized, hardened, industrial-grade) rather than software, cost, or user features.

No community discussion yet for this question.