Refer to the exhibit. Which two statements about this managed object are true? (Choose two)

Question

Options

• AThis object is part of the concrete model.
• BThere are endpoints with encapsulation vlan-2230 in the EPG name "web-server" on node 101.
• CThis object is part of the resolved model
• DThis object is part of the logical model
• EThis object represents an EPG named "web server" in tenant Prod.

• A
  3% (1)
• B
  74% (26)
• D
  9% (3)
• E
  14% (5)

Explanation

Options B and C are correct because the exhibit likely shows a resolved model managed object - specifically one under ACI's uni/epp/ (endpoint profile) subtree - which captures ACI's computed/resolved view of where endpoints exist. The object's attributes would explicitly show encapsulation vlan-2230, EPG "web-server," and node 101, making B a direct reading of those attributes.

Why the distractors are wrong:

• A (Concrete model): The concrete model lives under /sys/ on leaf nodes and represents actual hardware state. The resolved model (uni/epp/) is a distinct layer - ACI's policy resolution output - not the same as concrete.
• D (Logical model): The logical model is where you define policy (tenant, AP, EPG objects under uni/tn-). This object shows resolved endpoint state, not policy intent.
• E: The EPG name uses a hyphen - "web-server" - not a space. Also, the object represents endpoints within that EPG, not the EPG definition itself.

Memory tip: Think of ACI's three models as a pipeline - Define → Resolve → Deploy. Logical = what you configure, Resolved = what ACI calculates from your config, Concrete = what's actually programmed on the ASIC. If an object shows computed endpoint/VLAN binding data, it belongs to the resolved layer, not logical or concrete.

No community discussion yet for this question.