nerdexam
Cisco

352-001 · Question #593

What is design considerations of policy-based routing?

The correct answer is B. It can create microloops during network reconvergence. A key design concern for policy-based routing is that it can create microloops during reconvergence because PBR overrides routing table decisions independently on each router.

Design Considerations

Question

What is design considerations of policy-based routing?

Options

  • AIt decreases failure detection time
  • BIt can create microloops during network reconvergence
  • CIt routes traffic destined to a set of users through different exit points
  • DIt uses RSVP to differentiate traffic flows, so queuing mechanisms can prioritize them

How the community answered

(48 responses)
  • A
    4% (2)
  • B
    75% (36)
  • C
    13% (6)
  • D
    8% (4)

Why each option

A key design concern for policy-based routing is that it can create microloops during reconvergence because PBR overrides routing table decisions independently on each router.

AIt decreases failure detection time

PBR is a forwarding policy mechanism and plays no role in failure detection - it does not interact with BFD, hello timers, or any other detection protocol to decrease detection time.

BIt can create microloops during network reconvergenceCorrect

PBR applies forwarding decisions based on match criteria such as source IP or TCP/UDP port using route maps, bypassing the normal routing table. During reconvergence, routing table updates propagate at different times across routers while PBR policies remain static, causing inconsistent per-hop forwarding decisions across adjacent devices that result in microloops.

CIt routes traffic destined to a set of users through different exit points

Routing traffic through different exit points based on user groups describes the intended purpose and operational capability of PBR, not a design risk or consideration.

DIt uses RSVP to differentiate traffic flows, so queuing mechanisms can prioritize them

PBR uses route maps and extended ACLs to match and redirect traffic - it does not use RSVP, which is a signaling protocol for traffic engineering and bandwidth reservation.

Concept tested: Policy-based routing microloop risk during reconvergence

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/iproute_pi/configuration/xe-16/iri-xe-16-book/iri-plcy-bsd-rtg.html

Topics

#policy-based routing#microloops#reconvergence#traffic steering

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 352-001 Practice