352-001 · Question #451
A mobile service provider wants to design and deploy an Ethernet service with similar physical link failover/failback characteristics on the active/backup links as APS/MSP SONET. Which Layer 2 service
The correct answer is B. FlexLink. FlexLink provides Ethernet active/backup link failover with fast convergence characteristics similar to APS/MSP protection switching in SONET networks.
Question
A mobile service provider wants to design and deploy an Ethernet service with similar physical link failover/failback characteristics on the active/backup links as APS/MSP SONET. Which Layer 2 service addresses this design requirement?
Options
- AEthernet Pseudowires
- BFlexLink
- CMLPPP
- DPort-Channel
How the community answered
(28 responses)- A4% (1)
- B79% (22)
- C7% (2)
- D11% (3)
Why each option
FlexLink provides Ethernet active/backup link failover with fast convergence characteristics similar to APS/MSP protection switching in SONET networks.
Ethernet Pseudowires provide Layer 2 transport over MPLS/IP networks but have no inherent active/backup physical link protection mechanism comparable to APS/MSP.
FlexLink is a Cisco Layer 2 redundancy feature that operates in a strict active/backup model - one link forwards traffic while the standby link is immediately ready to take over upon failure, directly mirroring APS/MSP behavior. It provides deterministic sub-second failover and failback without depending on Spanning Tree Protocol convergence timers.
MLPPP bundles multiple PPP links into one logical channel to increase aggregate bandwidth, operating in active/active mode rather than providing active/backup failover.
Port-Channel (EtherChannel) aggregates multiple links for combined bandwidth in an active/active load-sharing model, not the active/backup protection switching required.
Concept tested: FlexLink active/backup Ethernet link protection
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst4500/12-2/25ew/configuration/guide/conf/flexlink.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.