352-001 · Question #32
A service provider creates a network design that runs MPLS in its WAN backbone using OSPF as the IGP routing protocol. What would be two effects of additionally implementing MPLS-TE? (Choose two.)
The correct answer is B. MPLS-TE is required to route different MPLS QoS service classes through different paths. E. MPLS-TE is required to create backup paths independently from the IGP.. MPLS-TE enables Diff-Serv-aware traffic engineering for QoS-based path differentiation and allows pre-established backup LSPs that operate independently from the IGP shortest-path topology.
Question
A service provider creates a network design that runs MPLS in its WAN backbone using OSPF as the IGP routing protocol. What would be two effects of additionally implementing MPLS-TE? (Choose two.)
Options
- AMPLS-TE is required to reroute traffic within less than 1 second in case of a link failure inside the
- BMPLS-TE is required to route different MPLS QoS service classes through different paths.
- CMPLS-TE and OSPF cannot be used together inside one MPLS network.
- DMPLS-TE cannot use OSPF for the traffic path calculation.
- EMPLS-TE is required to create backup paths independently from the IGP.
How the community answered
(36 responses)- A8% (3)
- B83% (30)
- C3% (1)
- D6% (2)
Why each option
MPLS-TE enables Diff-Serv-aware traffic engineering for QoS-based path differentiation and allows pre-established backup LSPs that operate independently from the IGP shortest-path topology.
Sub-second rerouting can also be achieved through other mechanisms such as IP LFA FRR without MPLS-TE, so the statement that MPLS-TE is strictly required for rerouting within less than 1 second is incorrect.
MPLS-TE with Diff-Serv Traffic Engineering (DS-TE) allows different QoS service classes to be mapped to separate TE tunnels that follow different physical paths through the network, which plain OSPF-based MPLS forwarding cannot achieve on its own.
MPLS-TE is fully compatible with OSPF and actually relies on OSPF-TE extensions (Type 10 opaque LSAs) to flood traffic engineering topology information used for path computation.
MPLS-TE uses OSPF (with TE extensions) as input to the Constrained Shortest Path First (CSPF) algorithm for TE tunnel path calculation, meaning the two protocols work together rather than being incompatible.
MPLS-TE Fast ReRoute (FRR) pre-establishes backup label-switched paths (LSPs) that are independent of the IGP topology, allowing traffic to be rerouted over pre-computed detours without waiting for OSPF to reconverge after a failure.
Concept tested: MPLS-TE QoS path separation and independent FRR backup paths
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/mp_te_path_protection/configuration/xe-16/mp-te-path-protection-xe-16-book/mp-te-frr-node-link-prot.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.