nerdexam
Cisco

352-001 · Question #248

Why is H-VPLS considered more scalable than flat VPLS?

The correct answer is A. It minimizes signaling overhead by building two separate layers pseudowire meshes. B. It minimizes signaling overhead by only requiring a full pseudowire mesh among N-PEs.. H-VPLS improves scalability over flat VPLS by introducing a two-tier hierarchy that limits the full pseudowire mesh to only N-PEs, dramatically reducing the number of signaling sessions required.

Network Virtualization

Question

Why is H-VPLS considered more scalable than flat VPLS?

Options

  • AIt minimizes signaling overhead by building two separate layers pseudowire meshes.
  • BIt minimizes signaling overhead by only requiring a full pseudowire mesh among N-PEs.
  • CIt eliminates signaling overhead on core devices.
  • DIt eliminates signaling overhead between the N-PE and U-PE.

How the community answered

(66 responses)
  • A
    77% (51)
  • C
    14% (9)
  • D
    9% (6)

Why each option

H-VPLS improves scalability over flat VPLS by introducing a two-tier hierarchy that limits the full pseudowire mesh to only N-PEs, dramatically reducing the number of signaling sessions required.

AIt minimizes signaling overhead by building two separate layers pseudowire meshes.Correct

H-VPLS creates two distinct signaling layers - a spoke layer between U-PEs and their associated N-PEs, and a hub layer consisting of a full mesh only among N-PEs - reducing total pseudowire count compared to a flat single-tier full mesh.

BIt minimizes signaling overhead by only requiring a full pseudowire mesh among N-PEs.Correct

By limiting the full pseudowire mesh to only N-PEs, H-VPLS ensures that mesh pseudowire count grows with the number of core devices rather than the total number of all PE routers, significantly lowering signaling overhead as the network scales.

CIt eliminates signaling overhead on core devices.

H-VPLS does not eliminate signaling overhead on core devices - N-PEs still maintain a full mesh of pseudowires and participate in LDP or BGP signaling among themselves.

DIt eliminates signaling overhead between the N-PE and U-PE.

H-VPLS does not eliminate signaling between N-PE and U-PE - spoke pseudowires or Ethernet aggregation connections between them still require control plane signaling.

Concept tested: H-VPLS hierarchy and pseudowire mesh scalability

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k_r4-0/lxvpn/configuration/guide/lxvpn40.html

Topics

#H-VPLS#VPLS scalability#pseudowire mesh#N-PE U-PE hierarchy

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 352-001 Practice