Refer to the exhibit. Assume that the bottom logical partition policy entry in Cisco Unified Communications Manager was provisioned last. How is the call treated when an IP phone in the Bangalore GeoLocation places a call to a MGCP gateway with FXS ports in the San Jose GeoLocation?

Question

Accepted Answer

A. The call is denied because the last added logical partition policy takes precedence when multiple In Cisco Unified Communications Manager's logical partition policy, when multiple entries match a call flow, the most recently provisioned (last added or modified) policy takes precedence. If this last provisioned policy results in a denial, the call will be denied.

Answer

B. The call is allowed because the first listed logical partition policy takes precedence when multiple This statement is incorrect because CUCM's logical partition policy logic dictates that the most recently provisioned policy takes precedence, not the first listed.

Answer

C. The call is denied because the call flow matches neither policy entries. This implies no match, but the question implies that the policies are relevant to the call flow, making precedence the key factor.

Answer

D. The call is allowed because the call flow matches neither policy entries. Similar to C, this implies no match, which is not the core issue when discussing policy precedence.

Answer

E. The call is allowed because only the top policy entry matches the call flow. This contradicts the rule of precedence where the last provisioned policy is considered, not necessarily the top one, and assumes a specific match that isn't the primary point of the question.

Refer to the exhibit. Assume that the bottom logical partition policy entry in Cisco Unified Communications Manager was provisioned last. How is the call treated when an IP phone in the Bangalore…

Question

Exhibit

Options

How the community answered

Why each option

Topics

Community Discussion