350-801 · Question #192
What is the difference between Cisco Unified Border Element and a conventional Session Border Controller?
The correct answer is C. Voice policy. While both CUBE and conventional SBCs offer similar technical functions, a key distinguishing factor is CUBE's tight integration with Cisco Unified Communications Manager (UCM) for advanced voice policy enforcement.
Question
What is the difference between Cisco Unified Border Element and a conventional Session Border Controller?
Options
- ASIP security
- BDTMF interworking
- CVoice policy
- DAddress hiding
How the community answered
(33 responses)- A3% (1)
- B3% (1)
- C94% (31)
Why each option
While both CUBE and conventional SBCs offer similar technical functions, a key distinguishing factor is CUBE's tight integration with Cisco Unified Communications Manager (UCM) for advanced voice policy enforcement.
Both CUBE and conventional SBCs offer robust SIP security features, including TLS, SRTP, and protection against denial-of-service attacks.
DTMF interworking, such as converting between RFC 2833 and SIP INFO, is a common feature provided by both CUBE and conventional SBCs.
Cisco Unified Border Element (CUBE) is deeply integrated into the Cisco Unified Communications ecosystem, allowing for advanced voice policy enforcement that leverages Cisco UCM routing and features. CUBE offers more specific and granular control over call routing, media flow, and policy applications within a Cisco-centric environment, often aligning directly with UCM call control policies.
Address hiding (topology hiding) is a standard security feature implemented by both CUBE and other SBCs to conceal internal network topology.
Concept tested: CUBE vs. generic SBC differences in voice policy
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/collab12/collab12/trunks.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.