350-701 · Question #16
Why would a user choose an on-premises ESA versus the CES solution?
The correct answer is A. Sensitive data must remain onsite.. Organizations choose an on-premises ESA over CES when strict data sovereignty or compliance regulations require sensitive email data to remain local.
Question
Why would a user choose an on-premises ESA versus the CES solution?
Exhibit
Options
- ASensitive data must remain onsite.
- BDemand is unpredictable.
- CThe server team wants to outsource this service.
- DESA is deployed inline.
How the community answered
(49 responses)- A94% (46)
- B2% (1)
- C4% (2)
Why each option
Organizations choose an on-premises ESA over CES when strict data sovereignty or compliance regulations require sensitive email data to remain local.
An on-premises Email Security Appliance (ESA) is chosen when an organization has stringent data sovereignty requirements, compliance regulations, or internal policies that mandate all sensitive email data and its processing must reside within the organization's physical control and data center, rather than a third-party cloud.
Unpredictable demand is typically a reason to choose cloud solutions like CES, as they offer elastic scalability to handle fluctuating loads more efficiently than fixed on-premises hardware.
If a server team wants to outsource a service, they would typically opt for a cloud-based solution like CES, as it offloads the operational and management responsibilities to a service provider.
Both on-premises ESA and cloud-based CES solutions can logically operate 'inline' by being the MX record destination, so this is not a distinguishing factor for choosing between them based on deployment type.
Concept tested: On-premises vs. Cloud Email Security
Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/security/email-security/on-prem-email-security.html
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.
