nerdexam
Cisco

350-501 · Question #340

How does an untrusted interface at the boundary of an administrative domain handle incoming packets?

The correct answer is A. It remarks all values to a CoS of 0. An untrusted interface at an administrative domain boundary typically handles incoming packets by remarking all existing QoS values, such as Class of Service (CoS), to a best-effort value like CoS 0.

Networking

Question

How does an untrusted interface at the boundary of an administrative domain handle incoming packets?

Options

  • AIt remarks all values to a CoS of 0.
  • BIt forwards only traffic with a DSCP value of 48.
  • CIt translates the IP precedence value to the corresponding DSCP value.
  • DIt drops all traffic ingressing the network.

How the community answered

(44 responses)
  • A
    89% (39)
  • B
    7% (3)
  • C
    2% (1)
  • D
    2% (1)

Why each option

An untrusted interface at an administrative domain boundary typically handles incoming packets by remarking all existing QoS values, such as Class of Service (CoS), to a best-effort value like CoS 0.

AIt remarks all values to a CoS of 0.Correct

An untrusted interface at the network boundary, designed for ingress traffic from external sources, typically remarks all incoming QoS values to a default best-effort class, such as CoS 0. This ensures that the internal network does not implicitly trust or honor any external QoS markings, preventing potential abuse and maintaining control over local QoS policies.

BIt forwards only traffic with a DSCP value of 48.

An untrusted interface would not forward only traffic with a specific high DSCP value; its purpose is to regulate all incoming traffic.

CIt translates the IP precedence value to the corresponding DSCP value.

While QoS systems can translate between IP Precedence and DSCP, the primary function of an untrusted interface is to reset or condition QoS markings, not just translate them.

DIt drops all traffic ingressing the network.

An untrusted interface is designed to receive and process traffic, not to drop all incoming packets; dropping all traffic would prevent any external communication.

Concept tested: Untrusted interface QoS behavior

Source: https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/ipqos/configuration/guide/12_2sr/rqos_c/rqos_intf.html#wp1010376

Topics

#Untrusted Interface#QoS#Traffic Remarking#Network Boundary

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 350-501 Practice