350-401 · Question #908
What is the purpose of the weight attribute in an EID-to-RLOC mapping?
The correct answer is B. It indicates the load-balancing ratio between ETRs of the same priority.. LISP EID-to-RLOC Mapping: Weight Attribute In LISP (Locator/ID Separation Protocol), the weight attribute defines how traffic is distributed across multiple RLOCs (Routing Locators) that share the same priority value, essentially controlling the load-balancing ratio - for example
Question
Options
- AIt determines the administrative distance of LISP generated routes in the RIB.
- BIt indicates the load-balancing ratio between ETRs of the same priority.
- CIt indicates the preference for using LISP over native IP connectivity.
- DIt identifies the preferred RLOC address family.
How the community answered
(16 responses)- A6% (1)
- B88% (14)
- C6% (1)
Explanation
LISP EID-to-RLOC Mapping: Weight Attribute
In LISP (Locator/ID Separation Protocol), the weight attribute defines how traffic is distributed across multiple RLOCs (Routing Locators) that share the same priority value, essentially controlling the load-balancing ratio - for example, a weight of 75 on one ETR and 25 on another means 75% of traffic goes to the first. This makes Option B correct.
Why the distractors are wrong:
- Option A is incorrect because administrative distance is a routing protocol concept applied in the RIB; LISP uses priority and weight within its own mapping system, not AD values.
- Option C is incorrect because preference between LISP and native IP connectivity is governed by the priority attribute (lower priority = preferred), not weight.
- Option D is incorrect because RLOC address family (IPv4 vs. IPv6) is identified by the RLOC address itself, not a weight value.
Memory Tip: Think of weight like a weighted scale - it only matters when two RLOCs are equal competitors (same priority), and the heavier side gets more traffic. "Same Priority → Weight decides the split" (P before W, just like the alphabet).
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.