Refer to the exhibit. Which configuration set implements Control Plane Policing for SSH and Telnet? A. B. C. D.

Question

Exhibits

Options

• ARouter(config)#class-map type inspect match-all Router(config-cmap)#match access-group 100 Router(config-cmap)#match access-group 101 Router(config)#policy-map CoPP Router(config-pmap)#class class-control Router(config-pmap-c)#police 1000000 conform-action transmit Router(config)#control-plane Router(config-cp)#service-policy output CoPP
• BRouter(config)#class-map match-all class-control Router(config-cmap)#match access-group 100 Router(config-cmap)#match access-group 101 Router(config)#policy-map CoPP Router(config-pmap)#class class-control Router(config-pmap-c)#police 1000000 conform-action transmit Router(config)#control-plane Router(config-cp)#service-policy output CoPP
• CRouter(config)#class-map class-telnet Router(config-cmap)#match access-group 100 Router(config-cmap)#match access-group 101 Router(config)#policy-map CoPP Router(config-pmap)#class class-telnet-ssh Router(config-pmap-c)#police 1000000 conform-action transmit Router(config)#control-plane Router(config-cp)#service-policy input CoPP
• DRouter(config)#class-map match-any class-control Router(config-cmap)#match access-group 100 Router(config-cmap)#match access-group 101 Router(config)#policy-map CoPP Router(config-pmap)#class class-control Router(config-pmap-c)#police 1000000 conform-action transmit Router(config)#control-plane Router(config-cp)#service-policy input CoPP

• A
  3% (1)
• B
  13% (4)
• C
  6% (2)
• D
  78% (25)

Explanation

Option D is correct because it uses match-any in the class-map, which classifies traffic matching either ACL 100 (SSH) or ACL 101 (Telnet) - and applies the policy-map with service-policy input on the control-plane, which is the correct direction to police traffic arriving at the router's CPU.

Why the distractors fail:

• A uses type inspect, which is Zone-Based Firewall syntax, not CoPP - and service-policy output is the wrong direction.
• B uses match-all, which would require a packet to match both ACLs simultaneously - impossible for a single protocol - and also applies the policy in the wrong output direction.
• C defines a class-map named class-telnet but the policy-map references a non-existent class-telnet-ssh, creating a name mismatch that breaks the policy binding.

Memory tip: Think "ANY in, protect within" - use match-any when policing multiple protocols (SSH or Telnet), and always apply CoPP as service-policy input on the control-plane because you're protecting against traffic coming in to the CPU.

No community discussion yet for this question.