nerdexam
CiscoCisco

350-401 · Question #68

350-401 Question #68: Real Exam Question with Answer & Explanation

The correct answer is D: It should be used when a customer's router is connected to an ISP over OSPF.. VRF-Lite Explained VRF-lite (Virtual Routing and Forwarding without MPLS) allows a single physical device to maintain multiple independent routing tables, making it ideal for separating customer traffic - which is why E is correct: one switch can serve multiple customers with com

Submitted by andreas_gr· Mar 6, 2026Virtualization

Question

Which two statements about VRF-lite are true? (Choose two)

Options

  • AIt can increase the packet switching rate.
  • BIt supports most routing protocols, including EIGRP, ISIS, and OSPF.
  • CIt supports MPLS-VRF label exchange and labeled packets.
  • DIt should be used when a customer's router is connected to an ISP over OSPF.
  • EIt can support multiple customers on a single switch.

Explanation

VRF-Lite Explained

VRF-lite (Virtual Routing and Forwarding without MPLS) allows a single physical device to maintain multiple independent routing tables, making it ideal for separating customer traffic - which is why E is correct: one switch can serve multiple customers with complete routing isolation. D is correct because VRF-lite is specifically designed for CE (Customer Edge) to PE (Provider Edge) scenarios, such as when a customer router connects to an ISP, allowing traffic separation without requiring full MPLS infrastructure.

Why the distractors are wrong:

  • A is incorrect - VRF-lite adds routing table overhead, which can actually decrease switching performance
  • B is incorrect - VRF-lite does not support IS-IS; it primarily supports EIGRP, OSPF, BGP, and static routes, but IS-IS is not VRF-aware in this context
  • C is incorrect - VRF-lite explicitly operates without MPLS; label exchange and labeled packets are features of full MPLS-VPN, not VRF-lite

🧠 Memory Tip: Think of the "lite" in VRF-lite as "without labels" - it gives you VRF traffic separation but strips away the MPLS complexity, making it perfect for simple multi-customer or ISP edge scenarios.

Topics

#VRF-lite#Multi-tenancy#Routing Isolation#Virtual Routing

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 350-401 PracticeBrowse All 350-401 Questions