Refer to the exhibit. An engineer attempts to create a configuration to allow the Blue VRF to leak into the global routing table, but the configuration does not function as expected. Which action reso

Standard access lists, when used with `match ip address` in a route-map for prefix matching, interpret the second operand as a wildcard mask. Changing the mask from `255.255.255.0` to `0.0.0.255` will allow `access-list 101` to correctly match routes for the `192.168.1.0/24` network, enabling the route leak.

The source network `192.168.1.0` is correct if that is the network intended to be leaked, but the issue lies with how the access-list mask is interpreted by the route-map for matching prefixes.

The route-map name `VRF_BLUE_TO_GLOBAL` is functional; changing it to `VRF_BLUE` does not address the access-list matching problem.

The access-list number `101` is referenced correctly within the route-map `match ip address 101` command; changing the number without a corresponding change in the access-list definition would break the configuration further.