350-401 · Question #345
Refer to the exhibit. What is the result when a switch that is running PVST+ is added to this network?
The correct answer is A. DSW2 operates in Rapid PVST+ and the new switc operates in PVST+. Explanation When a switch running PVST+ is added to a network where an existing switch (DSW2) is running Rapid PVST+, the two protocols operate independently per-port - the Rapid PVST+ switch (DSW2) detects the older PVST+ neighbor and falls back to 802.1D STP behavior on that sp
Question
Exhibits
Options
- ADSW2 operates in Rapid PVST+ and the new switc operates in PVST+
- BBoth switches operate in the PVST+ mode
- CSpanning tree is disabled automatically on the network
- DBoth switches operate in the Rapid PVST+ mode.
How the community answered
(31 responses)- A81% (25)
- B3% (1)
- C10% (3)
- D6% (2)
Explanation
Explanation
When a switch running PVST+ is added to a network where an existing switch (DSW2) is running Rapid PVST+, the two protocols operate independently per-port - the Rapid PVST+ switch (DSW2) detects the older PVST+ neighbor and falls back to 802.1D STP behavior on that specific port, while each switch continues running its own configured version, making A correct.
Why the distractors are wrong:
- B is wrong because DSW2 is running Rapid PVST+ and does not downgrade its entire operation to PVST+; it only uses legacy compatibility on the connected port.
- C is wrong because STP is never automatically disabled when mismatched versions connect - this would be a dangerous assumption and does not reflect actual switch behavior.
- D is wrong because a PVST+ switch cannot be automatically upgraded to Rapid PVST+; it must be manually configured to do so.
Memory Tip
Think of it like a language conversation - if you speak advanced English and someone speaks basic English, you slow down to accommodate them on that conversation, but you haven't forgotten how to speak advanced English. Rapid PVST+ accommodates PVST+, but each switch keeps its own STP version.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.

