350-201 · Question #81
A security analyst receives an escalation regarding an unidentified connection on the Accounting A1 server within a monitored zone. The analyst pulls the logs and discovers that a Powershell process…
The correct answer is A. Isolate the server and perform forensic analysis of the file to determine the type and vector of a. The combination of an unidentified connection, PowerShell and WMI process spawning, and a PE file dropped in the system directory are high-confidence indicators of active compromise requiring immediate isolation and forensic analysis.
Question
A security analyst receives an escalation regarding an unidentified connection on the Accounting A1 server within a monitored zone. The analyst pulls the logs and discovers that a Powershell process and a WMI tool process were started on the server after the connection was established and that a PE format file was created in the system directory. What is the next step the analyst should take?
Options
- AIsolate the server and perform forensic analysis of the file to determine the type and vector of a
- BIdentify the server owner through the CMDB and contact the owner to determine if these were
- CReview the server backup and identify server content and data criticality to assess the intrusion
- DPerform behavioral analysis of the processes on an isolated workstation and perform cleaning
How the community answered
(44 responses)- A68% (30)
- B18% (8)
- C5% (2)
- D9% (4)
Why each option
The combination of an unidentified connection, PowerShell and WMI process spawning, and a PE file dropped in the system directory are high-confidence indicators of active compromise requiring immediate isolation and forensic analysis.
Isolating the server immediately limits lateral movement and preserves volatile evidence before it is overwritten or destroyed. PowerShell and WMI are commonly abused by attackers in living-off-the-land techniques, and a PE format file appearing in the system directory after an unidentified connection is a strong indicator of a dropper or implant. Forensic analysis of the PE file identifies malware type, capabilities, and attack vector to guide full containment and remediation.
Contacting the server owner before isolating the system allows the attacker additional time to exfiltrate data or move laterally, and assumes the activity could be authorized when the technical evidence strongly indicates active compromise.
Reviewing backups to assess data criticality is a recovery and impact-assessment step that belongs after containment and forensic analysis, not before - delaying isolation increases the scope of damage.
Behavioral analysis on an isolated workstation is a valid malware analysis technique but should follow server isolation and forensic image collection; cleaning before full forensic analysis destroys evidence needed to determine the full scope of the intrusion.
Concept tested: Incident response containment and forensic analysis priority
Source: https://www.nist.gov/publications/computer-security-incident-handling-guide
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.