350-201(NEW-127Q) · Question #94
An employee abused PowerShell commands and script interpreters which lead to IOC triggers. An IOC event shows that a known malicious file ran which increased the likelihood of a successful breach…
The correct answer is C. ExecutedMalware.ioc. ExecutedMalware.ioc is correct because the scenario explicitly states "a known malicious file ran," which is precisely what this indicator detects - the execution of a recognized malicious binary or script. PowerShell abuse is a common delivery mechanism for malware execution…
Question
Options
- AW32.AccesschkUtility.ioc
- BConnectToSuspiciousDomain.ioc
- CExecutedMalware.ioc
- DCrossrider.ioc
How the community answered
(47 responses)- A6% (3)
- B2% (1)
- C89% (42)
- D2% (1)
Explanation
ExecutedMalware.ioc is correct because the scenario explicitly states "a known malicious file ran," which is precisely what this indicator detects - the execution of a recognized malicious binary or script. PowerShell abuse is a common delivery mechanism for malware execution, so when the malicious file launched, ExecutedMalware.ioc fired as the matching indicator.
Why the distractors are wrong:
- A (W32.AccesschkUtility.ioc) relates to the Sysinternals
accesschktool being used for privilege enumeration/reconnaissance - not malware execution. - B (ConnectToSuspiciousDomain.ioc) triggers on outbound network connections to known-bad domains - a network IOC, not a file execution IOC.
- D (Crossrider.ioc) is specific to the Crossrider adware/browser-hijacker family - unrelated to PowerShell-delivered malware.
Memory tip: Match the IOC name to the action described. The question says a file ran - "ExecutedMalware" literally encodes both the action (executed) and the threat type (malware), making it the direct match whenever a known-bad file is launched.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.