nerdexam
Cisco

350-201(NEW-127Q) · Question #72

An organization is conducting a vulnerability triage and risk analysis. The security team wants to prioritize vulnerabilities effectively using industry scoring systems. Which method should the team…

The correct answer is D. Calculate the CVSS base score and integrate asset criticality and threat intelligence insights. D is correct because effective vulnerability triage requires more than a raw severity score - you need to know how critical the affected asset is to your organization and whether attackers are actively exploiting it. The CVSS base score provides a standardized severity…

Vulnerability Assessment and Risk Management

Question

An organization is conducting a vulnerability triage and risk analysis. The security team wants to prioritize vulnerabilities effectively using industry scoring systems. Which method should the team use to ensure a thorough assessment?

Options

  • AUse the CVSS base score and correlate with the number of network vulnerabilities found.
  • BAssign a CVSS environmental score and analyze historical exploitation trend data.
  • CDetermine the CVSS temporal score and focus on immediate patch deployment decisions.
  • DCalculate the CVSS base score and integrate asset criticality and threat intelligence insights.

How the community answered

(40 responses)
  • A
    5% (2)
  • B
    23% (9)
  • C
    10% (4)
  • D
    63% (25)

Explanation

D is correct because effective vulnerability triage requires more than a raw severity score - you need to know how critical the affected asset is to your organization and whether attackers are actively exploiting it. The CVSS base score provides a standardized severity foundation, but integrating asset criticality (e.g., is this a public-facing payment server or an isolated dev box?) and threat intelligence (e.g., is there active exploitation in the wild?) transforms a generic score into a risk-ranked action list.

Why the distractors fail:

  • A - Correlating base score with "number of network vulnerabilities" is a volume metric, not a risk metric; quantity doesn't indicate business impact or exploitability.
  • B - The environmental score already accounts for asset-specific factors, but relying on "historical exploitation trends" alone ignores current threat intelligence; this is also incomplete and partially redundant with D.
  • C - The temporal score reflects exploit code maturity and vendor patch availability, which is useful for patch timing but too narrow to drive a thorough risk assessment.

Memory tip: Think of CVSS as a calculator with three lenses - Base (how bad universally), Temporal (how bad right now), Environmental (how bad for you). The best triage combines the universal baseline (Base score) with your unique context (asset criticality + live threat intel) - that's option D.

Topics

#CVSS Framework#Vulnerability Triage#Risk Assessment#Threat Intelligence

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 350-201(NEW-127Q) Practice