nerdexam
EC-Council

312-50V13 · Question #534

As a cybersecurity consultant for SafePath Corp, you have been tasked with implementing a system for secure email communication. The key requirement is to ensure both confidentiality and non…

The correct answer is D. Apply asymmetric encryption with RSA and use the private key for signing. Explanation Applying asymmetric encryption with RSA and using the private key for signing satisfies both requirements: the sender's private key creates a digital signature that proves authenticity and prevents denial (non-repudiation), while the recipient's public key can be…

Submitted by layla.eg· Mar 6, 2026Cryptography

Question

As a cybersecurity consultant for SafePath Corp, you have been tasked with implementing a system for secure email communication. The key requirement is to ensure both confidentiality and non- repudiation. While considering various encryption methods, you are inclined towards using a combination of symmetric and asymmetric cryptography. However, you are unsure which cryptographic technique would best serve the purpose. Which of the following options would you choose to meet these requirements?

Options

  • AUse symmetric encryption with the AES algorithm.
  • BUse the Diffie-Hellman protocol for key exchange and encryption.
  • CApply asymmetric encryption with RSA and use the public key for encryption.
  • DApply asymmetric encryption with RSA and use the private key for signing.

How the community answered

(49 responses)
  • A
    14% (7)
  • B
    6% (3)
  • C
    2% (1)
  • D
    78% (38)

Explanation

Explanation

Applying asymmetric encryption with RSA and using the private key for signing satisfies both requirements: the sender's private key creates a digital signature that proves authenticity and prevents denial (non-repudiation), while the recipient's public key can be used to encrypt the message for confidentiality - this combination is the foundation of secure email systems like S/MIME and PGP.

  • Option A (AES symmetric encryption) provides confidentiality but offers no non-repudiation, since any party sharing the symmetric key could have created the message.
  • Option B (Diffie-Hellman) is a key exchange protocol only - it establishes a shared secret but does not inherently provide encryption or digital signing for non-repudiation.
  • Option C is partially correct but incomplete - encrypting with a public key ensures confidentiality, but anyone can use a public key, so it provides no proof of who sent the message (no non-repudiation).

Memory Tip: Think "Private = Proof" - only you hold your private key, so signing with it proves it was you (non-repudiation). Public keys are for locking (encrypting), private keys are for proving (signing).

Topics

#Cryptography#Non-repudiation#Confidentiality#Digital Signatures

Community Discussion

No community discussion yet for this question.

Full 312-50V13 Practice