312-50V13 · Question #494
A security analyst is investigating a potential network-level session hijacking incident. During the investigation, the analyst finds that the attacker has been using a technique in which they…
The correct answer is C. RST hijacking. RST Hijacking Explained Why C is Correct: RST hijacking involves an attacker injecting a forged TCP Reset (RST) packet with a spoofed source IP address and a predicted/guessed acknowledgment number, which tricks the victim's system into believing the legitimate server has…
Question
Options
- ATCP/IP hijacking
- BUDP hijacking
- CRST hijacking
- DBlind hijacking
How the community answered
(59 responses)- A5% (3)
- B3% (2)
- C90% (53)
- D2% (1)
Explanation
RST Hijacking Explained
Why C is Correct: RST hijacking involves an attacker injecting a forged TCP Reset (RST) packet with a spoofed source IP address and a predicted/guessed acknowledgment number, which tricks the victim's system into believing the legitimate server has terminated the connection - forcibly resetting the session.
Why the Others Are Wrong:
- A (TCP/IP hijacking) is a broader technique where the attacker actively takes over an existing session by injecting data packets, not specifically terminating it with a reset packet.
- B (UDP hijacking) targets UDP (connectionless) sessions, which don't use TCP's handshake or RST mechanisms - making it irrelevant to this scenario.
- D (Blind hijacking) occurs when an attacker injects data into a TCP stream without seeing the responses, focusing on session manipulation rather than using a forged RST packet to terminate a connection.
Memory Tip: Think of RST = "Reset/Ruin Session Technique" - whenever you see a forged RST packet + spoofed IP + guessed ACK number = RST hijacking. The key giveaway in the question is the word "reset", which directly maps to the RST flag in TCP.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.