312-50V13 · Question #261
Andrew is an Ethical Hacker who was assigned the task of discovering all the active devices hidden by a restrictive firewall in the IPv4 range in a given target network. Which of the following host…
The correct answer is C. arp ping scan. ARP Ping Scan for IPv4 Host Discovery Why C is correct: ARP (Address Resolution Protocol) ping scan is the most effective technique for discovering active devices on a local IPv4 network, even when those devices are hidden behind a restrictive firewall. Because ARP operates at…
Question
Options
- AUDP scan
- BTCP Maimon scan
- Carp ping scan
- DACK flag probe scan
How the community answered
(47 responses)- A15% (7)
- B4% (2)
- C72% (34)
- D9% (4)
Explanation
ARP Ping Scan for IPv4 Host Discovery
Why C is correct: ARP (Address Resolution Protocol) ping scan is the most effective technique for discovering active devices on a local IPv4 network, even when those devices are hidden behind a restrictive firewall. Because ARP operates at Layer 2 (Data Link layer), it bypasses firewall rules that typically filter IP-based traffic - firewalls cannot block ARP requests on the local network segment, making it impossible for devices to hide from this type of scan.
Why the distractors are wrong:
- A (UDP scan): UDP scans operate at Layer 3/4 and can be blocked or filtered by firewalls, making them unreliable for discovering hidden hosts.
- B (TCP Maimon scan): This is a firewall evasion technique using FIN/ACK flags, but it's designed to map firewall rules, not reliably discover hidden hosts.
- D (ACK flag probe scan): This technique is primarily used to identify firewall rules and stateful filtering, not to discover active hosts hidden by firewalls.
Memory Tip: Think "ARP = Always Reveals Presence" - since ARP is essential for network communication at the hardware level, devices on a local network must respond to ARP requests, making it the go-to technique for local IPv4 host discovery regardless of firewall restrictions.
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.