312-50V12 · Question #188
A large organization is investigating a possible identity theft case where an attacker has created a new identity by combining multiple pieces of information from different victims to open a new…
The correct answer is D. Synthetic Identity Theft. This question tests knowledge of identity theft classifications, specifically how attackers construct fraudulent identities using combined data from multiple victims.
Question
Options
- AIdentity Cloning and Concealment
- BChild Identity Theft
- CSocial Identity Theft
- DSynthetic Identity Theft
How the community answered
(28 responses)- A4% (1)
- B7% (2)
- C11% (3)
- D79% (22)
Why each option
This question tests knowledge of identity theft classifications, specifically how attackers construct fraudulent identities using combined data from multiple victims.
Identity Cloning and Concealment involves an attacker fully assuming a single real person's existing identity to live as that person, not creating a new composite identity from multiple victims.
Child Identity Theft specifically targets minors by using a child's real personal information (typically their SSN) to commit fraud, rather than synthesizing data from multiple sources.
Social Identity Theft refers to hijacking a victim's social media accounts or online personas, which does not involve creating a new fraudulent identity from combined real-world data to obtain financial or government benefits.
Synthetic Identity Theft involves combining real information from multiple individuals (e.g., one victim's Social Security number with another's name and address) to create a entirely new, fictitious identity. This fabricated identity is then used to commit financial fraud such as opening bank accounts or obtaining government benefits, which precisely matches the described scenario.
Concept tested: Classification of synthetic identity theft type
Source: https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2021/03/synthetic-identity-fraud-what-it-is-why-it-matters
Topics
Community Discussion
No community discussion yet for this question.