The following is an entry captured by a network IDS.You are assigned the task of analyzing this entry. You notice the value 0x90, which is the most common NOOP instruction for the Intel processor. You figure that the attacker is attempting a buffer overflow attack. You also notice "/bin/sh" in the ASCII part of the output. As an analyst what would you conclude about the attack?

Question

Accepted Answer

D. The attacker is attempting an exploit that launches a command-line shell The 0x90 byte sequence is a classic NOP sled used to pad shellcode in buffer overflow exploits, guiding execution to the payload. The string '/bin/sh' is the path passed to execve() in standard shellcode to spawn a Bourne shell on Unix/Linux systems. Together these artifacts indicate an exploit attempting to gain interactive command-line access on the target.

Answer

A. The buffer overflow attack has been neutralized by the IDS An IDS captures and alerts on traffic but does not inherently block or neutralize attacks - that is the role of an IPS or firewall.

Answer

B. The attacker is creating a directory on the compromised machine The '/bin/sh' string references the shell binary, not a directory creation operation such as mkdir.

Answer

C. The attacker is attempting a buffer overflow attack and has succeeded The IDS capture shows an attempt in progress; success cannot be confirmed from network traffic alone without observing the target system's response and state.

The following is an entry captured by a network IDS.You are assigned the task of analyzing this entry. You notice the value 0x90, which is the most common NOOP instruction for the Intel processor. You

Question

Exhibit

Options

How the community answered

Why each option

Topics

Community Discussion