The following is an entry captured by a network IDS.You are assigned the task of analyzing this entry. You notice the value 0x90, which is the most common NOOP instruction for the Intel processor. You figure that the attacker is attempting a buffer overflow attack. You also notice "/bin/sh" in the ASCII part of the output. As an analyst what would you conclude about the attack?

Question

Accepted Answer

D. The attacker is attempting an exploit that launches a command-line shell In buffer overflow exploits, repeated 0x90 (NOP) instructions form a NOP sled that increases the probability of redirecting execution into the shellcode payload, and '/bin/sh' is the Unix/Linux Bourne shell binary path. Together these artifacts confirm the attacker crafted shellcode specifically designed to spawn an interactive command-line shell on the target system.

Answer

A. The buffer overflow attack has been neutralized by the IDS IDS detection does not equate to attack neutralization - the entry shows the IDS captured the traffic but provides no evidence the payload was blocked from executing on the target.

Answer

B. The attacker is creating a directory on the compromised machine Creating a directory would require mkdir-related system calls, not the execution of /bin/sh - the shell path indicates the intent is arbitrary command execution, not file system manipulation.

Answer

C. The attacker is attempting a buffer overflow attack and has succeeded A network IDS capture alone cannot confirm exploit success - it only shows the attack attempt was sent, not that it executed and spawned a shell on the target host.

The following is an entry captured by a network IDS.You are assigned the task of analyzing this entry. You notice the value 0x90, which is the most common NOOP instruction for the Intel processor. You

Question

Exhibit

Options

How the community answered

Why each option

Topics

Community Discussion